Demonstrators stand across the street from the federal courthouse in Houston, Monday, Nov. 2, 2020, before a hearing in federal court involving drive-thru ballots cast in Harris County.
David J. Phillip | AP
A federal judge on Monday rejected an effort by Republicans to invalidate more than 100,000 ballots cast at drive-thru voting locations in Democratic-leaning Harris County, Texas, in a case that has been closely watched because of its potential to affect the presidential race.
The judge, Andrew Hanen, said the plaintiffs in the case lack legal standing to challenge the use of 10 drive-thru voting locations set up in the county, which includes the city of Houston.
Hanen, whose ruling came just a day before Election Day, is likely to be appealed.
The judges said that if he had found that the plaintiffs, who include three Republican candidates for office, had legal standing, he probably would have barred drive-thru voting locations on Election Day itself, but would not have invalidated the ballots already cast at those locations.
“I do not find a tent to be building,” said Hanen, noting that tents are being used for the drive-thru locations, while the state law mandates that polling places be in a building.
Harris County, which is the third-largest county in the nation, set up the drive-thru voting locations to give voters concerned about visiting completely enclosed polling centers during the coronavirus pandemic.
So far, about 127,000 votes have been cast at those locations, contributing to the record of 1.4 million early votes cast in the entire county so far this election.
Hanen made the ruling after conducting a hearing that was broadcast over Zoom. Hanen was appointed to the bench by President George W. Bush.
The case has been of keen interest because of polls showing a very close race in Texas between President Donald Trump and former Vice President Joe Biden, the Democratic nominee.
Democrats also have made winning several Texas House races in the county a priority as part of a bid to win a majority in the the state House for the first time in two decades.
Harris County in recent elections has seen Democrats beating Republicans in vote tallies by bigger margins.
“The number of Democratic votes that come out of Harris County is very important for who wins the state,” Austin, Texas, attorney Fred Lewis told the Texas Tribune last month.
The state Supreme Court of Texas, whose entire bench is comprised of Republicans, on Sunday declined to act on a related Repbulican lawsuit that also sought to invalidate the drive-thru voting ballots. That suit had noted that nine of the 10 drive-thru polling are in “Democrat areas of the county.”
“We always knew that the law was on our side here,” Harris County Clerk Chris Hollins told NBC News on Sunday.
“We followed the election code to a ‘T.’ We worked with the secretary of state to introduce drive-thru voting. We know that it is legal, in addition to being safe and convenient.”
Demonstrator Gina Dusterhoft holds up a sign as she walks to join others standing across the street from the federal courthouse in Houston, Monday, Nov. 2, 2020, before a hearing in federal court involving drive-thru ballots cast in Harris County.
David J. Phillip | AP
The plaintiffs in the federal case said in their lawsuit, “By indiscriminately encouraging and allowing any and all Harris County registered voters to cast their ballots via curbside drive-thru voting, Defendant is violating both federal and state law, and Plaintiffs will suffer irreparable injury if such ultra vires action is not stopped.”
The plaintiffs include a doctor registered to vote in Harris County, and three other Republicans: state Rep. Steve Toth, Wendell Champion, who is seeking election to Congress from the state’s 18th Congressional District, and Sharon Hemphill, who is seeking a judgeship in state district court.
This is breaking news. Check back for updates.